There is some controversy over Jodie Foster's Golden Globes speech, through which she accepted the Cecil B. DeMille Award and made some impassioned comments about privacy. Watch the video. Respond with a blog post in which you attempt to answer questions about the rhetorical situation that Foster's speech seems to want to draw from as a springboard for ... for what? Ask:
- What do I know about Jodie Foster?
- Who was Cecil B. DeMille? What is this award intended to "mean"? (why is it given? does it have alternative "real" implications? what are they?)
- Who is Jodie Foster? Have I seen her work?
- What is her "public significance" in terms of popular media?
- In what sorts of public rhetorics is Jodie Foster invoked? (search this; don't simply rely on memory).
- What was her goal? What did she want her speech to do to/for you? What did she want you to think? to do? (or not think ... not do ... start doing, etc.)
- Was she clear? If not, why? Did it matter? How?
- Did you discern any subtextual discourses that may help us to understand her purpose(s)?
- Who was the audience? Of course, she was speaking, immediately, to the GG audience of her celebrity friends, but she was also speaking to hundreds of thousands of television and streaming web viewers, as well. How do you imagine Foster crafting this speech for *just that person(s)*?
- Was this an appropriate or effective venue for this speech? Why? Why not?
- Did you like it? Why? Why not?
video via Rolling Stone.